三星福彩是不是合法的

  • <tr id='au42sC'><strong id='au42sC'></strong><small id='au42sC'></small><button id='au42sC'></button><li id='au42sC'><noscript id='au42sC'><big id='au42sC'></big><dt id='au42sC'></dt></noscript></li></tr><ol id='au42sC'><option id='au42sC'><table id='au42sC'><blockquote id='au42sC'><tbody id='au42sC'></tbody></blockquote></table></option></ol><u id='au42sC'></u><kbd id='au42sC'><kbd id='au42sC'></kbd></kbd>

    <code id='au42sC'><strong id='au42sC'></strong></code>

    <fieldset id='au42sC'></fieldset>
          <span id='au42sC'></span>

              <ins id='au42sC'></ins>
              <acronym id='au42sC'><em id='au42sC'></em><td id='au42sC'><div id='au42sC'></div></td></acronym><address id='au42sC'><big id='au42sC'><big id='au42sC'></big><legend id='au42sC'></legend></big></address>

              <i id='au42sC'><div id='au42sC'><ins id='au42sC'></ins></div></i>
              <i id='au42sC'></i>
            1. <dl id='au42sC'></dl>
              1. <blockquote id='au42sC'><q id='au42sC'><noscript id='au42sC'></noscript><dt id='au42sC'></dt></q></blockquote><noframes id='au42sC'><i id='au42sC'></i>
                中國建設科技集團官方哈尔什微信
                微信公眾號  
                法務與風險Law&Risk
                法務動態
                法務知識
                風險警示
                當前位置 : 首頁 > 法務與風險 > 風險警示
                 
                法律風險預控警示快訊之东双河镇四:
                設計成果交付及確認的法律風險提示
                 
                發布時間: 2013-10-30 [特大 ]

                一、法律風險案例

                (一)案例介紹

                  2007年6月,設計人與發包人簽訂了《XX綜合樓》的設計合同。合同約定設計服務內容包括方案設計、初步設計、施工圖設計和施工配合,並約定了各階段設自由的瑟雷凯斯計周期及違約責任,下一階段阜阳职业技术学院設計周期均以上一設計階段工作完成為起算點。

                  在合官厅乡同履行過程中,設計人按期提交了全部方案設計文件。在初步設計過程中,發包人白虹剑口頭要求設計人提前交付某單體工程的初步設計和施工圖設計文件,並同意設計人適當推遲其他竹里畲族乡單體初步設計文件的交付龙麟散期限。此後,設計人按發包人要求及時』完成了某單體工程的初步設計文件和施工圖設計文件,但因趕工影響,其他大理细作單體初步設計文件未能按期交付。在設計人完成全白岩乡部初步設計文件之前,因項目土地遲遲無法落實,發包人電話通知虫群手套設計人暫停設計工作。

                   設計人提交某單體初步設計文件和施工圖設計文件時,由發包人所屬某普通工作人員簽收,但發包人並未临江区在簽收文件上加蓋公章。

                  設計工作中止一年後,設海兰街道計人因項目無任何進展,故要求發包人結算設計費,雙方發生爭議。設計人要求發包人按合同約定支付方案設計、已完成的某單體初步設計生活和施工圖設計工作的相應設計費,但發@包人提出:(1)發包人未收到設計人已交付的某單體火焰哥布林工程初步設計文件、施工圖設計文件,設計人提供的設計文件簽收人並@ 非發包人华中农业大学楚天学院的員工,發包人無義務支付相應的設計費;(2)在上一階达芙妮段設計文件被確認之前,設計人不應提前啟動下一階段設計工作;(3)設計人應按纱厂街道合同約定承擔未按期提交全部初步設計文件的違約責任。

                  因設計人無法證明簽收設計文件龙凤区者的身份,也無法提供發包人要伊吾镇求某單體初步設計文件和施工圖設計文件提前交付和其他單體相應設阳长镇計文件延期交付的證明,設計人最終被迫接受發包人提出的和解方案,因此蒙受重大經濟損失。

                一、Legal risk case

                (一)Case introduction

                   In June 2007, a designer and a developer signed the design contract of "XX integrated building”. Design services include conceptual design, preliminary design, construction drawing design and construction coordination as agreed in the contract, as well as liability for breach of contract. Each stage of the design cycle shall be calculated by the way that the starting point of the next phase of the design cycle is the completion of the former phase of the design.

                   During the performance of the contract, the designer submitted all the project design documents. In the initial design process, the developer orally required the designer to deliver preliminary design and construction drawing design documents of a single part of the whole project in advance, and agreed to appropriately postpone term of delivery of preliminary design documents for the other parts of the project. Thereafter, the designer of complete timely the preliminary design documents and construction drawings design documents of the single part according to the requirement of the developer. However, due to crashing, the preliminary design documents of the other parts could not delivered on time. Before completion of all the preliminary design documents, the developer informed the designer by phone that the designing would be suspended because of failure of approval for the project land.

                   When the designer submitted preliminary design documents and construction drawings design documents of the single part, an employee of the developer signed for it   with the developer stamping on it.

                   One year after the suspension of designing, because the project had no further progress, the designer demand settlement of design fees from the developer, which aroused controversy between the two parties. The designer required the developer to make the corresponding payment of conceptual design of the whole project, preliminary design and construction drawing design of the single part according to the contract. But the developer argued: (1) the developer hadn’t received preliminary design documents and the person signed on the design documents was not the employee of the developer, so the developer has no obligation to pay the corresponding design fees; (2) before design documents in the last stages to be confirmed by the developer, the designer should not to start the next stage of design work early; (3) the designer should assume the liability for breach of contract as agreed in the contract for failure of submitting all of the preliminary design documents.

                   Because the designer cannot prove to the identity of the signatory, and were unable to provide the proof that the developer required preliminary design documents and construction drawings design documents of the single part delivered ahead of schedule and agreed delay delivery of corresponding design documents of the other parts, the designer were eventually forced to accept a settlement proposed by the developer and suffered heavy losses.

                (二)案例分析 

                  上述設計人之所以蒙受重大經濟損失,主要存在三措周乡大失誤。

                  1、 合同約定的設計周期時間起算點不嚴謹;

                  2、 設計人輕信發包人的口頭要求,且事後南票区又未進行書面確認;

                  3、 設計成果交付手續不規範。

                 (二)Case analysis

                   There are three major mistakes causing heavy losses to the designer:

                   1. the starting time point of the design cycle agreed in the contract is less rigorous;

                   2.the designer easily believed the developer’s oral requirement without a written confirmation;

                   3. the delivery procedures of design results are lack of standardization.

                二、預控風險的建議

                   為預控設計成果交付及確認的法律風險,經集火精女奴團證券法務部、集團規劃運營部、北京市明誠律師事務所和北京時代九和律師事務所等四個部門的相關人員共同阿赖耶商討,一致建議如下:

                   1、 設計周期起算點的約定應一脚嚴謹

                   建議約定為“以業主的書面確認文件為準(對上一階段的設刻有符印的树皮計成果進行書面確認,並書面瓦房店指示開展下一階段的設計工作)”。

                   2、 嚴格設計文件的確認手續

                   1)嚴◢格執行設計合同約定的確認手續;

                   2)若設計合同沒有相關博学者护腿約定↙,則建議:要求發包人按階段簽發設計文件確認單,並帕果帕果加蓋公章;確認單內容應明確無異議;如該階段設計文件需政府主管部門審批,發包人應提供相應批復文件。

                   3)對於發包人口頭提出涉及合同變更事項的,事後應以補充協議或函件予以確認。

                   4)接到對方發送的溝通函後,應及時回復書富强路街道面意見。

                   3、 規範三种念佛設計文件交付手續

                   1)嚴格執行設計文件的交付手續;

                   2)若設計合同天门乡沒有相關約定,則建議:設計人交肉墙付設計文件時,應同時提交設計文件交付清單(包括設計階段、專業、圖號、數量等,不宜以“圖紙一套”的方式表湖田镇述),發包人在該清單上簽收並哈扎里加蓋公章,由設計人留存;必要時,可通過特快專遞方式予以交付屯城镇(應在“內件品名”和“數量”欄中寫明文件名稱及其數量),如對方拒↓收退回,應妥善保波光符管,不得開啟。

                二、Advices to pre-control the risk

                   In order to pre-control the design results delivery and confirm risk, after the discussion of Group Security and Legal Department, Group Planning and Operation Department,and external law firms (Beijing Professional Business Law Office and Beijing Jurisino Law Group), the suggestion of pre-control risks is as followed:

                   1. The convention of starting point of the design cycle should be rigorous

                The contract should agree that "the starting point of the design cycle is subject to the written confirmation of the owners (giving the written confirm of the design results of the previous stage, and written instructions to carry out the next phase of the design work)

                   2. Confirm procedures of design documents should be strict

                  1) Strictly implementation of the design contract confirm formalities

                  2) If the design contract does not have the related conventions, it is recommended that the owner should issue the design documents confirmation with official seal by stage; the content of the confirmation should be clear and without objection; if the design documents of the stage required approval of government departments, the owner shall provide the approval documents.

                  3) If the owner proposes the matter of the contract change by oral, it should confirm it by  supplemental agreement or letter afterwards.

                  4) Prompt respond should be done after receiving the communication letter of the owner and by written comments

                   3. Specification design document delivery procedures

                  1) Strict implementation of the design document delivery procedures

                  2) If the design contract does not have related agreement, it is recommended that when the design documents are delivered, the design documents delivery list (including the design stage, major, drawing number, quantity, etc., the expression of "a set of drawing" is not appropriate) should be submitted at the same time. The owner should sign and chop with the official seal on the list and retained by the designer. When necessary, it could be delivered by speedpost (indicate the file name and the number in the "name" and "quantity" column), if the owner reject, the mail should be safekeeping and not be opened.

                 
                瀏覽次數:164031 [打印][關閉]文章來源:
                上一篇:法律風險李集乡預控警示快訊之五:投資房地產項目法律風險提示
                下一篇:法律風險預控警示快訊之三:
                勞動用工中的知識產權保護風險新会市提示
                 
                聯系我們  |  特別聲明  |  網站地圖  |  使用幫助 ipv6 ready
                版權所有:AG真人旗舰厅  地址:北京市西城區德勝門外☉大街36號   郵編:100120
                京ICP備05028899號-2   京公網安毒性吐息備1101020444號  推薦顯示器分◥辨率:1024*768   IE7.0以上瀏覽器

                "AG真人国际厅,ag真人国际厅网站,AG真人旗舰厅"wkybfm.com

                "AG真人国际厅,ag真人国际厅网站,AG真人旗舰厅"wkybfm.com